Bartolome
de las Casas (1474-1566) was a Spanish historian and “missionary.” According to
Norton Anthology, he is considered to
be the “Protector of the Indians.”(p. 39). De Las Casas attended a school
called Seville, and there is where he first heard of the discovery of new land
and Indians. De Las Casas would see Columbus proudly walking through his city
with, according to The Norton Anthology, “Seven Indians who had survive the voyage.” (p. 38). Columbus brought other things
as well which
slightly influence De Las Casas to be a member
of party that will have him partaking in the exploitation of natives.
Once
Bartolome became
a priest he convinced himself that all actions
that he and other have done to the natives were wrong and does not tie with Christian
teachings. He wrote this in one of his books called, History of the Indies. He went on to say, “went about his concerns
like the others, sending his share of Indians to work fields and gold mines,
taking advantage of them as much as he could.” Once
he was labeled “Protector of the Indians” by the government, they gave him
permission to find a peaceful colony on the Venezuelan coast. De Las Casas then
decided to find solutions to stop the violent acts towards Natives. One of his
plans were to, according to a passage in Norton
Anthology, “Import Africans to the Indies to replace the enslaved
Indians.” Later he realized he was just
as wrong by writing in History of the
Indies, “black slavery was as unjust as Indian slavery, and was no remedy
at all.”
Bartolome
de las Casas is really know for his work called, The Very Brief Relation of the Devastation of the Indies. In this
book, he gives the read a very detailed and gruesome story of the voyage in
Hispaniola that he and other were apart of in 1502. He went on and discussed
things like, raping women, murdering babies, and for the most part burning
victims alive. De Las Casas said in the context of Norton Anthology, “They took infants from their mothers’ breasts,
snatching them by the legs and pitching them headfirst against the crags or
snatched them by the arms and threw them into the rivers, roaring with
laughter.” This shows how heartless and cruel he and the others were. He also
quoted that, “They laid bets as to who, with one stroke of the sword, could
split a man into two.
Finally
what I found most disturbing
was his description of them burning the Natives. They wrapped them in straw and
set them on fire and watch their souls leave their bodies. De Las Casas also recalls the screams from the
victims from being burned and the reaction of the captain’s request. The
captain could not sleep because of the screams so according to De Las Casas,
“he ordered (the constable) them to be strangled.” Instead of struggling they,
“put a stick over the victim’s tongues, so they could not make a sound, and he
stirred up the fire, but not too uh, so that they roasted slowly, as he like.
I
strongly believe his works, especially this one, is important because you can see the transition of his
thought process of the whole act of dehumanizing Natives.
Reading his works, you can see he is a person who is repenting for his previous
acts and it is not what God wanted. Tis was rare because most Christians in
that time claimed they were doing “God’s Will.” He took a step back by thinking
of replacing Indians with Africans but realized that was just as wrong. His
works can even be used todays time for what is going on now. Especially with
the Native Americans now. Currently in South Dakota there is a crisis involving
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and Dakota Access Pipeline. According to an article
about the pipeline with the Washington
Post, “that runs through North and South Dakota, Iowa, and Illinois, and
has a capacity to transport more than 500,000 barrels of oil a day.” It was
approved to cross under the Missouri River just a mile north of the
reservation. This will affect their source of water and ruin grave sites of
their ancestors. Security of the DAPL recently released vicious dogs on the
protestors. This relates to De Las Casas because in his book, he also mentioned
their use of dogs towards Natives. De Las Casas states, “Pursed them with the
fierce dogs they kept which attacked the Indians, tearing them to pieces and
devouring them.”
Bartolome
de las Casas also made this document personal because he shared pin point
details about the cruel actions he witness while on his voyage. You can tell
that he felt guilty about because after he then changed and decided to protect
them. He also didn’t use the term savage or out of their names, he called them Natives.
That meant a lot because other would just called them out their names
disrespectfully. I personally felt as though he left out if he actually did the
actions or he just watched and allowed it to happen.
Hi Brandon,
ReplyDeleteThis is a largely successful post. To make it even stronger, I suggest that you reorganize it in chronological order to better represent De Las Casas’s transformation. Also you might meditate on what makes him different from the other European explorers/imperialists at the time. For instance, you highlight that De las Casas witnessed Columbus’s return; however, you don’t give adequate context for how De las Casas is different than Columbus. Draw on Columbus and compare him to De las Casas. Grammatically, please focus on subject/verb agreement and be sure to cite properly.